In Possession Of

When something is Scripturally correct thru and thru, I will give God thanks. Creeds that are not Scripturally correct, however, are in the possession of those teaching falsehoods as true today. The Anthanasian Creed is not Scripturally correct. The one looking to validate “the Son is God” is actually drawing from a plethora of false teachings, that if not for the Anthanasian Creed wouldn’t exist at all. Each and every time one links Jesus to “the Son is God,” “God and Man,” they are not only lifting up the Anthanasian Creed, they are contradicting the biblical account of Jesus ascending to His God and Father. Jesus said to her, “Do not cling to Me, for I have not yet ascended to My Father; but go to My brethren and say to them, ‘I am ascending to My Father and your Father, and to My God and your God.’” John 20:17 (NKJV) After reading John 20:17, would you say the Anthanasian Creed’s “the Son is God” is meaningless? I would. I do give God thanks, wholeheartedly, for the biblical account of Jesus ascending to His God and Father (John 20:17). If you are finding it problematic to disregard “the Son is God” altogether, know what is at stake here. Each and every time one picks up the Bible, they are actually in possession of the inspired word of God. Scripturally speaking that would be the God that Jesus ascended to, Jesus’s God, and Father. God bless. In His Care… Jim