“Blessed be
the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Father of mercies and God of
all comfort,” Apostle Saul (who is also called Paul), 2 Corinthians 1:3 (NKJV)
In
the precious and beautiful name of Messiah Yeshua “Jesus,” greetings.
Let’s get this out of the way from
the get go. The [Biblical] Yeshua never
claimed to be God, nor do His teachings support the Anthanasian Creeds “the Son
is God”.
As I listened to the local “Christian” radio station I heard
the names of nine or ten people linked to the Anthanasian Creed. None of which are found in the inspired word
of God which would make [perfect] sense, because neither is the Anthanasian
Creeds “the Son is God”.
The fact of the matter is the
Anthanasian Creeds [false] method of salvation wasn’t made known to the public until
325-AD, thus making it [Biblically] impossible to find anyone following it [in]
the inspired word of God, let alone responsible for it surfacing when it did.
If followers of that creed could
get a handle on that [Biblical] fact, they’d realize their entire system of
belief puts the inspired word of God at the mercy of a man-made doctrine. In this case, the one that surfaced in 325
AD, is the high priest of all false doctrines, the Anthanasian Creed.
This individual on the radio made a huge mistake when attempting
to link the Anthanasian Creeds “God and Man” to the one dying on a cross for
the sin of the world who happens to be the Son of God. He stated
that “No one can understand Jesus being both [God and Man] on the cross, but
the church does set boundaries as to how far one can go with it.” How is it that the church feels they can set
boundaries on something they can’t even explain? The speaker is not helping his cause.
While listening to the same local “Christian” radio station
I heard another person say, this just a few hours after hearing the “God and
Man” thing. “If you want people to know
God, you have to preach God, through the word.”
My first thought after hearing it was that the speaker was absolutely
correct, but because I know he’s a follower of the Anthanasian Creed, he has
mistaken his own understanding for the inspired word God.
Followers of the Anthanasian Creed
should take time to listen to others believing the same as them to determine whether
or not they have the same boundary or is the line vague? Saying things like the “church” has set
boundaries to something they themselves can’t understand, leaves the exact line
obscure at best. If there is a set line,
who determined where it would be set when it can’t really be explained.
When it comes to God’s plan of salvation the line is crystal
clear in the teachings of the [Biblical] Yeshua. We can understand it because it is written. Saying “no one can understand” to anything
linked to the Anthanasian Creeds [false] method of salvation isn’t hard to believe. Its followers are [forced] to say such things. As a firm believer [in] Messiah Yeshua it is
my obligation to tell you that God’s intention is for you to understand Him and
not be concerned with imaginary lines drawn by men.
God bless.
In His Care… Jim
No comments:
Post a Comment