From One Believer To Another

From One Believer To Another

If this is your first time visiting this blog, “Welcome!”

As you read, I pray you’ll not see me as being angry at anyone. Firm at times with some, I’ll agree with that. I know that no matter what a person has gone through, things they’ve said or done, or still doing for that matter, there’s a 50/50 chance of my having sought forgiveness for doing the exact same thing at one time or another. I know the battle is not against flesh and blood my friend.

Throughout this blog you will find me quoting things heard on the radio. You’ll not find the names of those who said these things in the posts. I do document their names, the date, time, and radio station call sign on my copy of the original document. I do not publish these details because our mission should be to expose the false teachings not to personally attack the person.

If you should continue reading my friend, you will find the Anthanasian Creed being exposed for what it is, a false doctrine. The word of God having the final say. My trusting in He who knows hears and sees all things, the God of the [Bible].

Friday, February 21, 2014

I Invite [you] into "The Conversation"

Greetings Friends,

Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ.

This posting is the direct result of a “conversation” taking place between myself and John found within the comments under the post titled  [With] Yeshua, the answer will be “yes” (February 10, 2014).

If in the future you're wanting to talk about, question, "challenge," what God has placed in my care, and this pertains to anyone, please, be prepared to give me the “foundation,” source, of your belief.

Example: If you’re going to say you are a "Christian" and you believe Yeshua is God, then be prepared to give me the [Biblical] (Bible verse and/or verses) evidence of it being so. If you’re going to use outside sources (interpretations of Scripture) such as “from the Greek,” “my teacher/pastor/priest said,” etc.…, give me the reason why you trust it/them; as being 100% accurate (being passed on to you, from the source, correctly). 

  • We are talking about the salvation of a person’s soul here, and anything less than 100% will be (coming from me) placed next to everything Yeshua said, and did; which will be found in the Scriptures (I use the New King James Version); as given to me by the Spirit of God.

Please don’t forget the fact of me clearly establishing having once believed in man’s interpretations of the Scriptures making Yeshua God. If you [think] for one second I’m not familiar with them, you’d be greatly mistaken. I choose not to talk/write about them because they’re the very things that caused [me] to [question], [doubt], and the teachings saying Yeshua was God, it in the first place.  All I have to do now is allow those still believing Yeshua is God to use them in their attempt to “prove,” make Him so; it's fail-proof.

  • I'm coming against the false doctrines of man, not the writer's of them themselves. It's all about the words they left us with and not the writer's of them. I can safely say the Anthanasian Creed (325-AD) is the high priest of them, false doctrines, all. In regards to Athanasius' eternal destination, none of us knows his [final] decision made, concerning it.

There is [zero] no Biblical evidence of Yeshua being God; therefore, as those believing He is give, "expose," their reasons for believing it is so, that falsehood comes to the surface. The word of God will [now] get placed next to it/them and they'll be "placed," returned to where it/they belong, outside the [Scriptures]; without any evidence of them being, a [Biblical] truth; which is the reason why they, those believing Yeshua is God, continuously ignore [direct] questions concerning the [Biblical] Messiah Yeshua.

I’m going to give you my source right up front, and it’s a [Biblical] fact: Everything, no matter what the topic, will have the Spirit of God having the final say concerning it; which will be in agreement with everything Yeshua (as given to Him by God) said, and did; it’s fail-proof.
God bless!

In Love, In His Care…Jim


  1. Jim, your only authority is yourself. Saying that the "Spirit of God" gave you this understanding is ridiculous. How is your interpretation escape being "man's interpretation?" Cult leaders such as Charles Russell and Joseph Smith claim revelation from the Spirit of God just as you do. Why is your interpretation the correct one? Explain how your "revelation" is "the right one."

  2. The Adonai of the Old Testament is the only one to properly receive worship.
    The Adonai is the King of Israel in the Old. Jesus is the King of Israel in the New Testament.

    These are all scriptures. No comments. Jesus is God, my friend.

    "And when they had come into the house, they saw the young Child with Mary His mother, and fell down and worshiped Him. And when they had opened their treasures, they presented gifts to Him: gold, frankincense, and myrrh." Gospel of Matthew 2:11 NKJV.

    And behold, a leper came and worshiped Him, saying, “Lord, if You are willing, You can make me clean.” Gospel of Matthew 8:2

    He who has seen Me has seen the Father; so how can you say, ‘Show us the Father’? Do you not believe that I am in the Father, and the Father in Me? John 14:9

    In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. 2 He was in the beginning with God. 3 All things were made through Him, and without Him nothing was made that was made. 4 In Him was life, and the life was the light of men. 5 And the light shines in the darkness, and the darkness did not comprehend it.... And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, and we beheld His glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father, full of grace and truth. John 1:1-5, 14

    Thus says the Lord, the King of Israel
    and his Redeemer, the Lord of hosts:
    “I am the first and I am the last;
    besides me there is no god.
    Isaiah 44:6

    Rejoice greatly, O daughter of Zion!
    Shout aloud, O daughter of Jerusalem!
    Behold, your king is coming to you;
    righteous and having salvation is he,
    humble and mounted on a donkey,
    on a colt, the foal of a donkey.
    Zech 9:9

    Nathanael answered and said to Him, “Rabbi, You are the Son of God! You are the King of Israel!” John 1:49

    saying, “Where is He who has been born King of the Jews? For we have seen His star in the East and have come to worship Him.” Matthew 2:2
    When you read the NKJV you are reading men's interpretation of the original hebrew and greek of the bible. You must rely on Greek scholars to bring the New Testament NKJV to you.

  3. John! That's it!! "You must rely on Greek scholars to bring the New Testament NKJV to you," is, [A SOURCE]. You have clearly identified "Greek Scholars" as being responsible (again, according to you) for bringing/giving the "New Testament" to us. Now, let's get down to identifying the [SOURCE] of the [interpretation(s)] of it, (whatever version a person chooses to use) the Bible.

    I can safely say (I'm giving you what I've witnessed), people attending the same earthly institution called church, use different versions of the Bible. The bottom line comes down to the [teaching(s)] they're hearing concerning it, what they're reading/seeing in their version of the Bible (as they sit in the pews); which will be influenced by the [SOURCE] they're trusting in.

    It's not about what version of the Bible a person chooses to read, it's how do they know what they're reading/hearing/ seeing concerning what's found within it, is a truth, or not, that's my concern (as given to me by the Spirit of God); which would agree with everything Yeshua said, and did.

    Now that you've established "Greek Scholars" as being the [SOURCE] of us having the "New Testament," give me, the viewing audience, your [SOURCE] of the interpretation(s) of it. Keep going my friend, and keep it simple. I believe you can give the [SOURCE] within [one] comment.

    John, [PLEASE] make it your next one or I'll continue to do as previously stated in my [comment] found in the post titled [With] Yeshua, the answer will be "yes" (February 10, 2014, 12:14am) with the date of February 25, 2014 and the time 12: 51am attached to it, saying, "Don't expect any response from me until you answer the question".

    In Love, In His Care...Jim

    Like I explained to you earlier, it's not about what version of the Bible a person uses my friend. It's what they're interpreting the words within it to say/mean,is, the issue. You're the one caught up on me using the New King James Version of the Bible.

    Since you've clearly identified "Greek Scholars" as being the "SOURCE," reason for me having it, my "NKJV" of the Bible, let's move on to the issue I'm concerned with, the [interpretation(s)], of it.

  4. Correction: I did not say Greek Scholars "gave us the NT" implying that they INSPIRED it. God inspired (breathed) the NT and OT. He used man to record it for us. So the source of the bible is both God (inspired) and Man (under the direction of the Spirit of God). Likewise, man does not inspire the Word of God.

    The ENGLISH versions are NOT INSPIRED, they are translations of the Greek and Hebrew, and some Aramaic. As long as you realize that the NKJV the NIV, the KJV, the whatever version already encompasses INTERPRETATION. One cannot translate without INTERPRETING. Every reader of English, will then need to interpret from the English translation.

    To understand the Bible takes the Spirit of God. We know nothing apart from that. AND His Spirit uses our minds, our language, our culture, our logic, our spirit, our fellow man, to communicate these truths to us.

  5. John, could all this have something to with your [SOURCE] of the interpretations of the Scriptures? As you know, I've been trying to get you to "expose," reveal that to not only myself, but to the viewing audience as well.

    With the Love of God, In His Care...Jim

  6. I just explained my source in the previous comment. GOD's Spirit through my mind, language, culture, fellow man (via my mind)... You claim that the Spirit of God revealed that Jesus is not God. That is your claim to authority. You claim the only interpretation you have is from God. And that somehow makes your interpretation not "man's" interpreation. This is foolishness.

    However, your interpretation does not agree with the Scripture. The question then is whose interpretation is correct? Yours or mine (plus billions of other Christians) or neither of us.
    Now, this is not a numbers game. Rather, it is like telling time, there can be a right answer. There is one right answer.

    The Christians in the 4th Century were dealing with this same issue. The Church leaders met and discussed and prayed and AFFIRMED the belief that Jesus was fully God and fully Man according to the NT texts.

    Arius the original author of this heresy listened to the council's ruling and agreed with them. Arius' followers did not however and remain to this day Polytheist (worship of a demi-god) and heretics.

    The title Son of God is a divine title. Son of Man is a divine title. If you have seen me, you have seen the Father. I and the Father are One. In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. The Word was made flesh and lived among us. Jesus is the Word, Jesus was God and became Flesh and lived among us.

    With that. I have said all I can say for a long time. The Christian Church does not support your heretical view. You are a false prophet in no uncertain terms.

    May the Spirit of Truth open your eyes to what is clearly revealed in Scripture.
    With Great Love and Concern,